|Brocker I 662
Communitarianism/MacIntyre: MacIntyre refuses to be classified as a communitarian. (1) This refusal is stringent, since MacIntyre sees neither in a modern communitarianism nor in the implantation of an antique communitarianism into modernism a possibility to get out of the impasse. See Modernism/MacIntyre, Ethics/MacIntyre, Morals/MacIntyre.
MacIntyre: Thesis: we live in an epoch after the virtue. MacIntyre is not prepared to accept contemporary communitarianism as a possible response to the crisis of liberalism.
MacIntyreVsCommunitarianism: The option of such a corrective dualism of liberalism and communitarianism falls below the problem level given to it. There is no easy way out of the disastrous situation of modernism.
1. Alasdair MacIntyre „I’m not a Communitarian, But…” in: The responsive Community. Rights and Responsibilities, 1/3, 1991, p. 91.
Jürgen Goldstein, „Alasdair MacIntyre, Der Verlust der Tugend“ in: Manfred Brocker (Hg.) Geschichte des politischen Denkens. Das 20. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt/M. 2018_____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. The note [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.
Geschichte des politischen Denkens. Das 20. Jahrhundert Frankfurt/M. 2018