Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Conditioning: Conditioning in psychology refers to the process of learning associations between stimuli and responses. A. Classical conditioning involves pairing a neutral stimulus with an unconditioned stimulus to elicit a conditioned response. B. Operant conditioning focuses on the association between behaviors and their consequences, reinforcing or punishing actions to influence future behavior. See also Stimuli, Behavior, Reinforement Sensitivity, Reinforcement learning, Learning theories, Association._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Michelle G. Craske on Conditioning - Dictionary of Arguments
Slater I 29 Conditioning/Craske: Craske (2003)(1) (…) details (…) features associated with classical conditioning and its likely role in the development of fears and phobias. Craske Thesis: (…) she suggests that conditioning depends on vulnerability factors such as negative affectivity and a threat-based style of regulating negative affect, preferential attention to potential threat stimuli, a physiological state of preparedness for threat stimuli, and avoidant responding to potential threats. These characteristics seem to converge and begin to suggest why some individuals are more easily conditioned than others. >Conditioning/Psychological theories, Cf. >Conditioning/Watson. 1. Craske, M. G. (2003). Origins of phobias and anxiety disorders. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. Thomas H. Ollendick, Thomas M. Sherman, Peter Muris, and Neville J. King, “Conditioned Emotional Reactions. Beyond Watson and Rayner’s Little Albert”, in: Alan M. Slater and Paul C. Quinn (eds.) 2012. Developmental Psychology. Revisiting the Classic Studies. London: Sage Publications_____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Craske, Michelle G. Slater I Alan M. Slater Paul C. Quinn Developmental Psychology. Revisiting the Classic Studies London 2012 |
||
> Counter arguments against Craske
> Counter arguments in relation to Conditioning
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-25