Thinking/Black: not to be covered with "various linguistic clothes" - if a thought is supposed to be "too profound for words", we have to ignore it - Vs"Clothing Model": would lead to regarding all speaking as the encoding process and hearing as decoding.
Wrong: "Think before you speak" - Vs Cl.I.Lewis: meaning very well comes into existence through communication (otherwise Clothing Model) - however Black Thesis: thinking without language is possible - E.g. imagining chess positions.
Speech current does not need to be accompanied by a parallel stream of mental events - the spoken language needs no mental correlate to be meaningful.
Hardly possible to distinguish between thoughts and linguistic representation.
But: Language/Tractatus/Wittgenstein: 4.002 language disguises the thought - in a way that one cannot infer the shape of the clad thought from the outer shape of the dress._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. The note [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.
"Meaning and Intention: An Examination of Grice’s Views", New Literary History 4, (1972-1973), pp. 257-279
Handlung, Kommunikation, Bedeutung, G. Meggle (Hg), Frankfurt/M 1979
The Labyrinth of Language, New York/London 1978
Sprache. Eine Einführung in die Linguistik München 1973
The Prevalence of Humbug Ithaca/London 1983
"The Semantic Definition of Truth", Analysis 8 (1948) pp. 49-63
Truth and Meaning, Paul Horwich, Aldershot 1994