Philosophy Dictionary of Arguments

Home Screenshot Tabelle Begriffe

 
Author Item Summary Meta data
I 23
thinking/Husserl: laws of thinking cannot be causal laws, because then wrong thinking would have to be subject to other laws. No errors would be possible.
In addition, a criterion of the logically correctness for judging could not be derived from the causal sequence, since this is to be judged according to it. (>Circle).
I 31
Act/Husserl: an act is not an activity. It is a performance of thought but not a real activity.


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.
The note [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.
E. Husserl
I Peter Prechtl, Husserl zur Einführung, Hamburg 1991
II "Husserl" in: Eva Picardi et al., Interpretationen - Hauptwerke der Philosophie: 20. Jahrhundert, Stuttgart 1992


Send Link
> Counter arguments against Husserl

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  



Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2020-04-08
Legal Notice   Contact   Data protection declaration