Philosophy Dictionary of Arguments

Home Screenshot Tabelle Begriffe

 
Compositionality, linguistics, language philosophy: the thesis (originally by G. Frege, Grundlagen der Arithmetik, 1884) that the meaning of composite expressions, e.g. sentences, results from the meanings of the parts. It follows that a change of the parts, e.g. replacement of a single word by another, can change the meaning of the entire composite structure. See also Frege principle.
_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

 
Author Concept Summary/Quotes Sources

Steven Pinker on Compositionality - Dictionary of Arguments

I 151
Compositionality/PinkerVsFrege: The question of compositionality must also consider the type of connection.
>Syntax
, >Grammar.
I 153
Different: baby saw chicken/chicken saw baby - this shows that the building blocks are not separated.
>Surface structure, >Deep structure.
I 154f
Neural networks/thinking: active/passive, units.
Baby eats: does not say what - snail is eaten does not say by whom.
Wrong solution: relevance.
>Relevance.
Correct solution: representation.
>Representation.
For this there is an aditional layer of units. Similar to Mentalese.
>Mentalese/language of thought.

_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments
The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.

Pi I
St. Pinker
How the Mind Works, New York 1997
German Edition:
Wie das Denken im Kopf entsteht München 1998


Send Link
> Counter arguments against Pinker
> Counter arguments in relation to Compositionality

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Y   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  



Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-19
Legal Notice   Contact   Data protection declaration