Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Experience: a) reflected perception, which can be compared with prior perceptions and can be processed linguistically. See also events, perception, sensations, empiricism. b) an event that is processed in the consciousness of a subject. No mere imagination. See also events, imagination, consciousness._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Paul Natorp on Experience - Dictionary of Arguments
Gadamer I 73 Experience/Consciousness/Critical Psychology/Natorp/Gadamer: [To the] fundamental meaning which Kant's critique of all substantive soul teachings and the transcendental unity of self-consciousness distinguished from the latter, which possesses the synthetic unity of apperception, (...) [t]o this critique of rationalist psychology, the idea of a psychology according to a critical method could be connected, as Paul Natorp had already done in 1888(1) and on which later Richard Hönigswald founded the concept of the psychology of thought(2). Natorp, through the concept of consciousness, which expresses the immediacy of experience, has designated the object of critical psychology and developed the method of universal subjectivation as the research method of reconstructive psychology. Later, Natorp has supported and further developed his basic approach by a detailed criticism of the concept formation Gadamer I 74 of contemporary psychological research. But already in 1888 the basic idea was established that the concretion of the primordial experience, i.e. the totality of consciousness, represents an undivided unit, which is only differentiated and determined by the objectifying method of recognition. Consciousness/Natorp: "Consciousness, however, means life, i.e. continuous correlation". This is particularly evident in the relationship between consciousness and time: "Given is not consciousness as a process in time, but time as a form of consciousness"(3). >Durée/Bergson. 1. P. Natorp, Einleitung in die Psychologie nach kritischer Methode 1888; Allgemeine Psychologie nach kritischer Methode 1912 (Neubearbeitung). 2. R. Hönigswald, Die Grundlagen der Denkpsychologie, 1921, 2. Aufl. 1925. 3. Natorp a.a. O. S 32._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Natorp, Paul Gadamer I Hans-Georg Gadamer Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik 7. durchgesehene Auflage Tübingen 1960/2010 Gadamer II H. G. Gadamer The Relevance of the Beautiful, London 1986 German Edition: Die Aktualität des Schönen: Kunst als Spiel, Symbol und Fest Stuttgart 1977 |
||
> Counter arguments against Natorp
> Counter arguments in relation to Experience
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-20