Economics Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Sensory Impressions, philosophy: the concept of impression is intended to serve as a boundary to the concept of perception. It places the weight on information not yet processed on the side of the receiving subject. Perception, on the other hand, refers to prepared information, which allows classification, storage and evaluation. See also stimuli, perception, sensations, input, information, qualia._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
George Berkeley on Sensory Impressions - Dictionary of Arguments
I 215f Senses/perception/mind/Berkeley: separates the benefits of the senses sharp and so displays the proportion of the mind. >Reason, >Experience. VsLocke: then spatial extent is no primary quality but relative. I 216 Synthesis problem: the sensed object is not the same as the visual object - it is still the same thing - This holds true no matter whether you deny the material things with Berkeley. Solution/Berkeley: all perceptions are mine - the sensed object/visual object: such as character and object, are one by habit._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
G. Berkeley I Breidert Berkeley: Wahrnnehmung und Wirklichkeit, aus Speck(Hg) Grundprobleme der gr. Philosophen, Göttingen (UTB) 1997 |
||
> Counter arguments against Berkeley
> Counter arguments in relation to Sensory Impressions
