Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Vocabulary: A language’s vocabulary comprises all the words currently used by its speakers. The vocabulary is written down in dictionaries in comparison to grammar and syntax rules laid down in “rule books”. Vocabulary can be reduced to its use at a particular time or by individual speakers for the purpose of research. See also idiolect, language, private language, conservatism, words, meaning of a word, meaning. _____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Anita Avramides on Vocabulary - Dictionary of Arguments
I 92 Vocabulary/PeacockeVs "actual language relation". Supposedly this approach does not need semantic vocabulary. Peacocke later: Gricean intentions cannot be used as evidence for the radical interpretation, but that is not VsGrice. >Christopher Peacocke, >Intentions/Grice, >Radical Interpretation, >Speaker intention._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Avr I A. Avramides Meaning and Mind Boston 1989 |
||
> Counter arguments against Avramides
> Counter arguments in relation to Vocabulary
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-19