Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Interpretation: A) Making statements about other statements, whereby new vocabulary may be introduced. If no new vocabulary is introduced, new information can be obtained by changing the syntactic grouping. B) In logic, interpretation is the insertion of values (objects) instead of the constants or free variables. _____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Franz Brentano on Interpretation - Dictionary of Arguments
Fodor IV 128 Brentano/Quine: Brentano was right with his thesis about the irreducibility of the intentional to physical states or properties. (Davidson provides an a priori argument for this (in Mental Events)). But this cannot be mentioned here ((s) in relation to the question of holism) because it has the holism of the intentional as a premise. Vs: 1. it does not seem that the realism of the intentional is compatible with the Brentano thesis. But if the intentional is not real, it appears to not matter if content is holistic. 2. If the bearers of meaning are, in the first instance, representations, then the theory of interpretation has no interesting relation to the theory of content. For, in fact, representations are never the subject of anybody's interpretation. Interpretation: their actual objects are propositional attitudes, speech acts, etc., not representations. >Representation, >Content._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Brent I F. Brentano Psychology from An Empirical Standpoint (Routledge Classics) London 2014 F/L Jerry Fodor Ernest Lepore Holism. A Shoppers Guide Cambridge USA Oxford UK 1992 Fodor I Jerry Fodor "Special Sciences (or The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis", Synthese 28 (1974), 97-115 In Kognitionswissenschaft, Dieter Münch, Frankfurt/M. 1992 Fodor II Jerry Fodor Jerrold J. Katz Sprachphilosophie und Sprachwissenschaft In Linguistik und Philosophie, G. Grewendorf/G. Meggle, Frankfurt/M. 1974/1995 Fodor III Jerry Fodor Jerrold J. Katz The availability of what we say in: Philosophical review, LXXII, 1963, pp.55-71 In Linguistik und Philosophie, G. Grewendorf/G. Meggle, Frankfurt/M. 1974/1995 |
||
> Counter arguments against Brentano
> Counter arguments in relation to Interpretation
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-16