Philosophy Dictionary of Arguments

Home Screenshot Tabelle Begriffe

 
Animals: Animals are subjects of moral consideration, prompting debates on ethics, consciousness, and our responsibilities towards non-human beings in philosophical discourse. They challenge notions of personhood and the nature of sentience.
_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

 
Author Concept Summary/Quotes Sources

Rosie Braidotti on Animals - Dictionary of Arguments

Braidotti I 70
Animals/Braidotti: We need to devise, (…) , a system of representation that matches the complexity of contemporary non-human animals and their proximity to humans. The point now is to move towards a new mode of relation; animals are no longer the signifying system that props up the humans’
self-projections and moral aspirations. They need to be approached in a neo-literal mode, as a code system or a ‘zoontology’ of their own (Wolfe, 2003)(1).The second major manifestation of the problematic and contradictory familiarity between humans and animals is linked to the market economy and labour force. Since antiquity, animals have constituted a sort of zoo-proletariat, in a species hierarchy run by the humans. They have been exploited for hard labour, as natural slaves and logistical supports for humans prior to and throughout the mechanical age.
They constitute, moreover, an industrial resource in themselves, animal bodies being primary material products starting from milk and their edible meat, but think also of the tusks of elephants, the hides of most creatures, the wool of sheep, the oil and fat of whales, the silk of caterpillars, etc.
Braidotti I 71
The posthuman in the sense of post-anthropocentrism displaces the dialectical scheme of opposition, replacing wellestablished dualisms with the recognition of deep zoe-egalitarianism* between humans and animals.
>Posthumanism.

*[The] vitalist approach to living matter displaces the boundary between the portion of life - both organic and discursive - that has traditionally been reserved for anthropos, that is to say bios, and the wider scope of animal and non-human life, also known as zoe.

1. Wolfe, Cary (ed.) 2003. Zoontologies. The Question of the Animal. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments
The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.



Braidotti I
Rosie Braidotti
The Posthuman Cambridge, UK: Polity Press 2013

Send Link
> Counter arguments against Braidotti
> Counter arguments in relation to Animals

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Y   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z