Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Frame theories: Frame theories examine how the way information is presented can influence how people interpret and respond to it. Frames are mental constructs that people use to organize and process information. They can be influenced by a variety of factors, including personal experiences, cultural values, and the media. See also Cultural relativism, Interpretation, Meaning, Sense, Communication._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Peter Gärdenfors on Frame Theories - Dictionary of Arguments
I 48 Frame Theories/Linguistics/Gärdenfors: frame theories have become popular in cognitive sciences, linguistics and computer science. They allow for vacancies that can be filled with characteristics. --- I 49 GärdenforsVsFrame theories: I place more emphasis on the geometric structure of conceptual representations. We can thus better express the extent to which concepts are more closely related or central. Frame-Semantics/Fillmore/Gärdenfors: Fillmore's approach is the best-known case of using frames. (Fillmore (1968, 1976, 1982)).(1)(2)(3) Definition Frame/Fillmore: characterizes a small "scene" or "situation". In order to understand the semantic structure a verb is needed, to understand the schematized scene. Frame Theory/Pustejovsky/Gärdenfors: (Pustejovsky, 1991)(4): introduces a "Qualia structure" as a representative tool transversely to categories. 1. Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach & E. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1–88). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 2. Fillmore, C. (1976). Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech, 280, 20–32. 3. Fillmore, C. (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing. 4. Pustejovsky, J. (1991). The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics, 17, 409–441._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Gä I P. Gärdenfors The Geometry of Meaning Cambridge 2014 |
||
> Counter arguments against Gärdenfors
> Counter arguments in relation to Frame Theories
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-20