Economics Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| History: History is the study of the past, especially the people, events, and trends that have shaped our world. This is about the part of the past that was determined and experienced by consciousness. See also Historiography, Culture._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Wilhelm Dilthey on History - Dictionary of Arguments
Pfotenhauer IV 62 History/understanding/Vico/Dilthey: Dilthey wanted to adhere to Vico's principle of the general comprehensibility of historical phenomena. This should be asserted against the positivist indifference that was determined to look at history and nature in the same way. (DiltheyVsComte). >A. Comte. Dilthey's thesis: Dilthey proposed to interpret the event from the point of view of the objectives of interested, value-oriented subjects.(1) >Purposes, >Intentions, >Action. Pfotenhauer IV 63 HeideggerVsDilthey/GadamerVsDilthey/Pfotenhauer: From Heidegger(3) to Gadamer(3) the reproach of historical-esthetic presumption arose; one wanted to delightfully take posession of the humane in a way of understanding everything. The limitations of perspectives that have been shaped by biographical history are not methodically taken into account sufficiently. "Everyone is the most distant thing to oneself". >Understanding, >Hermeneutics, >Self-knowledge. Nietzsche's dictum could be regarded as a pointed wording for this objection. Pfotenhauer IV 97 Form/Content/Art/Nietzsche/Pfotenhauer: (F.Nietzsche 1888(4)): One is an artist at the price, that what all non-artists call 'form' is perceived as content, as the 'thing itself'. Content/Nietzsche/Pfotenhauer: the content would be the internal coherence itself, the internal coherence of the content. >Content, >Historiography. 1. M. Riedel Verstehen oder erklären? Stuttgart 1978, S. 19ff. 2. M. Heidegger, Sein und Zeit, Tübingen 1953, S. 397. 3. G. Gadamer, Wahrheit und Methode, Tübingen 1972, S. 205ff. 4. F. Nietzsche, Nachgel. Fragm. Nov. 1887-März 1888, KGW VIII,2 S. 251f._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Dilth I W. Dilthey Gesammelte Schriften, Bd.1, Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften Göttingen 1990 Pfot I Helmut Pfotenhauer Die Kunst als Physiologie. Nietzsches ästhetische Theorie und literarische Produktion. Stuttgart 1985 |
||
