Psychology Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Objects of Thought - Psychology Dictionary of Arguments | |||
| Objects of thought, philosophy: it is advocated by some authors that beliefs or thoughts must correspond to objects. Other authors see this as the risk of an objectification or reification. When several speakers refer on their inner object there is the problem of whether it is the same or not. For example, do they have the same wish? See also relation-theory, truthmakers, mentalism, reification._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Item | More concepts for author | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anscombe, G. E. M. | Objects of Thought | Anscombe, G. E. M. | |
| Brentano, Franz | Objects of Thought | Brentano, Franz | |
| Burge, Tyler | Objects of Thought | Burge, Tyler | |
| Gärdenfors, Peter | Objects of Thought | Gärdenfors, Peter | |
| Reid, Thomas | Objects of Thought | Reid, Thomas | |
|
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2025-01-19 | |||
