Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome | |||
| |||
Two Dogmas - Philosophy Dictionary of Arguments | |||
Quine, Two Dogmas of Empricism: 1st Dogma distinction analytic/synthetic - 2nd Dogma reductionism. The belief that each meaningful statement is equivalent to a logical construction of terms which refer to immediate experience. - Quine, W.V.O. (1951), "Two Dogmas of Empiricism," The Philosophical Review 60, 20–43. Reprinted in his 1953 From a Logical Point of View. Harvard University Press. See also analytic/synthetic, reduction, reductionism, conceptual schemes, holism. Later D. Davidson discussed a 3rd dogma (separation scheme/content)._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
Author | Item | More concepts for author | |
---|---|---|---|
Brandom, Robert | Two Dogmas | Brandom, Robert | |
Davidson, Donald | Two Dogmas | Davidson, Donald | |
Dummett, Michael E. | Two Dogmas | Dummett, Michael E. | |
Esfeld, Michael | Two Dogmas | Esfeld, Michael | |
Fodor, Jerry | Two Dogmas | Fodor, Jerry | |
McDowell, John | Two Dogmas | McDowell, John | |
Millikan, Ruth | Two Dogmas | Millikan, Ruth | |
Quine, W.V.O. | Two Dogmas | Quine, Willard Van Orman | |
Rorty, Richard | Two Dogmas | Rorty, Richard | |
Sellars, Wilfrid | Two Dogmas | Sellars, Wilfrid | |
|