Dictionary of Arguments


Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]

Screenshot Tabelle Begriffes

 

Find counter arguments by entering NameVs… or …VsName.

Enhanced Search:
Search term 1: Author or Term Search term 2: Author or Term


together with


The author or concept searched is found in the following 1 entries.
Disputed term/author/ism Author
Entry
Reference
Maximum Chisholm II 80f
Minimum/Maximum/Sorites/Gombocz: for some properties there is no unproblematic minimum - unproblematic: e.g. shortest duration, smallest speed - but also: minimum of dentition one tooth - of hair: one hair - no hair: categorical transition, other property than hairiness.

Wolfgang L. Gombocz. Maxima. In: M.David/L. Stubenberg (Hg) Philosophische Aufsätze zu Ehren von R.M. chisholm Graz 1986

Chisholm I
R. Chisholm
The First Person. Theory of Reference and Intentionality, Minneapolis 1981
German Edition:
Die erste Person Frankfurt 1992

Chisholm II
Roderick Chisholm

In
Philosophische Aufsäze zu Ehren von Roderick M. Ch, Marian David/Leopold Stubenberg Amsterdam 1986

Chisholm III
Roderick M. Chisholm
Theory of knowledge, Englewood Cliffs 1989
German Edition:
Erkenntnistheorie Graz 2004


The author or concept searched is found in the following controversies.
Disputed term/author/ism Author Vs Author
Entry
Reference
Essentialism Simons Vs Essentialism I 272
Mereological essentialism/Chisholm/Simons: disarmingly simple example by Chisholm: (1976,146) E.g. a table is formed out of a stub and a plate. It is only the same table, if both remain the same.
chisholm: so it should seem that a certain table is necessarily built of this plate and this stub.
Simons: this is the only example of "Person and Object".
I 273
As it stands, it is indeed convincing. a: stub, b: plate, c: the restulting table:

N(E!c > (t)[Ext c > a ≤≤t c u b ≤≤t c])

Everyday language translation/logical form/(s) : "(t)[E Ext a...": "at all times in which", "always if a c exists.. " – "N(E!c > …”:a c has to....”… - "N(E!c > (t)[Ext c ..." "a c always has to...".
Simons: different than the sum that also would exist if plate and stub would not be connected, the table can only exist if both are connected.
Superposition/Simons: so the parts do not guarantee the existence of the table (or the identity of the table with the sum)!
I 275
SimonsVsEssentialism: that e.g. the engine of a car must be a specific engine is not so clear. Here there is room for vagueness and convention. Pro essentialism: clear case: e.g. an atom must have these particular protons, otherwise it is a different atom.
I 276
(...) Chisholm pro Essentialism: >Sorites, sorites/Chisholm.
SimonsVschisholm/SimonsVsEssentialism: our everyday linguistic concept scheme provides no such identity conditions and living conditions for ordinary objects (things, objects) so that they could not continue to exist at the slightest change.
I 278
Most of the objects of science Ex stars, planets, organisms, volcanoes are such that they are both: natural objects or whole while mereologically variable so that there is a Middle way: against could between chisholm's extreme essentialism and the position that the parts of an object would be merely determined arbitrarily or conventionally:
Simons: thesis: one could assume a "naturally unified object". (see below: "Normal style", "Normal thing", "Normal piece of music").

I 338
Connection/Whitehead: (see above WD5’) Individuals are connected if they have a binary sum. Together with Tiles' definition then in Whitehead's system each individual is self-connected, which corresponds to his intentions. SimonsVsExtensionality: all this does not refute the arguments VsCEM: systems that limit the existence of sums and smallest upper bounds, but nevertheless remain extensional, are still too strong to be able to act as a general theory of part and whole. (They are still useful).
Characteristic relation/whole/Simons: continuity is only one characteristic relationship among many. Some may not be important, but one should not exclude any a priori.
E.g. the political relations between Alaska and the rest of the United States outweigh the spatial continuity with Canada.
Continuity: but helps to exclude discontinuous sums. E.g. sums of chemicals of several organisms.

Simons I
P. Simons
Parts. A Study in Ontology Oxford New York 1987