Find counter arguments by entering NameVs… or …VsName.
The author or concept searched is found in the following 4 entries.
| Disputed term/author/ism | Author |
Entry |
Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semantic Categories | Semantic category (meaning category): a) e.g. the difference between the expression for an activity and the expression for the intention of this activity - b) e.g. the difference between propositions and predicates. |
||
| Semantic Categories | Cresswell | II 69 Semantic Category/Meaning Category/Cresswell: 0 Example: category of propositions 1: Category of things 0/1: Category of the functions of things in the category 1 to things of category 0. These are the meanings of the unary predicates. II 95 Semantic Category/Cresswell: E.g. 0: Proposition - corresponding syntactic category: sentence. >Semantics, >Syntax, >Propositions, >Sentences. II 103 Semantic Category/Meaning category/Cresswell: an expression and its meaning may not be in the same category). >paradoxes, >Levels. |
Cr I M. J. Cresswell Semantical Essays (Possible worlds and their rivals) Dordrecht Boston 1988 Cr II M. J. Cresswell Structured Meanings Cambridge Mass. 1984 |
| Semantic Categories | Evans | II 216 Semantic categories/Evans: Semantic categories cannot be reduced, as you cannot reduce rules of inference by increasing the axioms |
EMD II G. Evans/J. McDowell Truth and Meaning Oxford 1977 Evans I Gareth Evans "The Causal Theory of Names", in: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. Vol. 47 (1973) 187-208 In Eigennamen, Ursula Wolf Frankfurt/M. 1993 Evans II Gareth Evans "Semantic Structure and Logical Form" In Truth and Meaning, G. Evans/J. McDowell Oxford 1976 Evans III G. Evans The Varieties of Reference (Clarendon Paperbacks) Oxford 1989 |
| Semantic Categories | Tarski | Berka I 498 Def Semantic Category/meaning category/Husserl/Tarski: 1. two expressions belong to the same meaning category when its first propositional function is one that contains any of these phrases. 2. When no function that contains one of these expressions loses the character of a propositional function if this expression is substituted by the other - ( reflexive, transitive, symmetric). Example of Category propositional function: e.g. names of individuals - e.g. variables. >Propositional functions, >Variables, >Proper names, >Meaning categories. I 499 Def Main Principle of semantic categories/Tarski: in everyday language a single case seems to satisfy the propositional function which is preserved while replacing the expression. >Everyday language. Meaning category/Tarski: here not for compound expressions but only for variables - Decisive is the mere form. Wit of the Main Principle: we want that substitution always results in new statements, we can use as variables only expressions of the same semantic category. >Inserting, >Substitution, >Abstraction/Tarski. I 500 It follows that no character can be a functor of two functions at the same time that can have a different number of arguments or two such functions (even if they have the same number of arguments) in which two of their relevant arguments belong to different meaning categories. >Uniqueness, >Unambiguity, >Functors. I 520 Bound variables have no influence on the semantic type.(1) >Bound variables. 1. A.Tarski, Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen, Commentarii Societatis philosophicae Polonorum. Vol. 1, Lemberg 1935 |
Tarski I A. Tarski Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics: Papers from 1923-38 Indianapolis 1983 Berka I Karel Berka Lothar Kreiser Logik Texte Berlin 1983 |
| |||
No results. Please choose an author or concept or try a different keyword-search.