Find counter arguments by entering NameVs… or …VsName.
The author or concept searched is found in the following 1 entries.
| Disputed term/author/ism | Author |
Entry |
Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstinence Theory | Rothbard | Rothbard II 137 Abstinence Theory/interest/Rothbard: If profit were perhaps related to risk, what then accounts for the long-run ‘interest’ component of business profits? The dominant explanation for long-run interest in British economics soon became the abstinence theory of interest. The first presentation of time as the determinant of interest came from a theory related but superior to abstinence: Samuel Bailey's pioneering time-preference theory. Bailey's discussion came in the course of his brilliant demolition of Ricardo's labour theory of value and his championing of an alternative utility theory. Bailey begins his discussion of time and value by noting that if one commodity takes more time than another for its production, even using the same amount of capital and labour, its value will be greater. Ricardo: While Ricardo admits a problem here, James Mill in his Elements of Political Economy indefatigably asserts that time, being ‘a mere abstract word’, could not possibly add to anything's value. VsAbstinence theory: VsMill, James: Rebutting Mill, Bailey points out that ‘every creation of value’ implies a ‘mental operation’ - in short, a subjective analysis of value. Given a particular pleasure, Bailey went on, ‘We generally prefer a present pleasure or enjoyment to a distant one’ – in short, the omnipresent fact of time-preference for human life. >Time-preference. Rothbard II 138 Nassau William Senior: But the locus classicus of the abstinence theory was the lectures of Nassau W. Senior. It is true that they were not published until 1836, when they were published as the Outline of the Science of Political Economy (and also as the article on ‘Political Economy’ for the Encyclopedia Metropolitana), but they were delivered earlier as lectures at Oxford in 1827-28. Senior pointed out that savings and the creation of capital necessarily involve a painful present sacrifice, an abstinence from immediate consumption, which would only be incurred in expectation of an offsetting reward. Unfortunately, Senior lacked the concept of time-preference, so he was fuzzy about the specific motivation that would lead people to prefer present to future consumption. But he came to very similar conclusions, relating the degree of abstinence-pain (or, as the Austrians would later put it, time-preference for the present over the future) to ‘the least civilized’ peoples and the ‘worst educated’ classes, who are generally ‘the most improvident, and consequently the least abstinent’. >Capital/Senior. |
Rothbard II Murray N. Rothbard Classical Economics. An Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic Thought. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Cheltenham 1995 Rothbard III Murray N. Rothbard Man, Economy and State with Power and Market. Study Edition Auburn, Alabama 1962, 1970, 2009 Rothbard IV Murray N. Rothbard The Essential von Mises Auburn, Alabama 1988 Rothbard V Murray N. Rothbard Power and Market: Government and the Economy Kansas City 1977 |
| |||
No results. Please choose an author or concept or try a different keyword-search.