Find counter arguments by entering NameVs… or …VsName.
The author or concept searched is found in the following 1 entries.
| Disputed term/author/ism | Author |
Entry |
Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compositionality | Boer | I XVII Compositional semantics/belief-attribution/Boer: thesis: the compositional semantics should not explain the logical oddity of belief attribution as a pragmatic illusion (as Boer and Lycan attempted in 1980)(1) but accept and explain it. (BoerVsBoer, self-criticism). 1. Boer, St. & Lycan, W.G. "Who? Me?" In: The Philosophical Review 89:427-66. |
Boer I Steven E. Boer Thought-Contents: On the Ontology of Belief and the Semantics of Belief Attribution (Philosophical Studies Series) New York 2010 Boer II Steven E. Boer Knowing Who Cambridge 1986 |
| |||
| Disputed term/author/ism | Pro/Versus |
Entry |
Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relation Theory | Versus | Cresswell I 64 Relationstheorie/propositionale Einstellungen/Cresswell:: VsRelationstheorie (propositionale Einstellungenals Relation zu Glaubensobjekten. - Lycan: pro Relationstheorie - SchifferVsLycan - SchifferVsBoer - CresswellVsLycan. - CresswellVsBoer. I 5 CresswellVs I 110 Cresswell: ich selbst akzeptiere eine Theorie, in der die Bedeutung von SAGT eine Person mit einer Bedeutung in Relation setzt ((s) Lager Cresswell pro Relationstheorie: Glaubensobjekt = Bedeutung (Proposition).) |
Cr I M. J. Cresswell Semantical Essays (Possible worlds and their rivals) Dordrecht Boston 1988 Cr II M. J. Cresswell Structured Meanings Cambridge Mass. 1984 |
| |||