Disputed term/author/ism | Author![]() |
Entry![]() |
Reference![]() |
---|---|---|---|
Ethics | Husserl | I 115 ff HusserlVsHume: there is no ethics of feelings. HusserlVsKant: VsCategorical Imperative/HusserlVsKant: a formal generalization is not sufficient to characterize ethical correctness. Husserl: a fictitious observer must be able to understand my assessment: a) passively, by chance in circumstances or b) through acting on purpose, reasonable. >Categorical Imperative, >Circumstances, >Emotivism, >Noncognitivism, >Intersubjectivity/Husserl. |
E. Husserl I Peter Prechtl, Husserl zur Einführung, Hamburg 1991 II "Husserl" in: Eva Picardi et al., Interpretationen - Hauptwerke der Philosophie: 20. Jahrhundert, Stuttgart 1992 |
![]() |
Disputed term/author/ism | Author Vs Author![]() |
Entry![]() |
Reference![]() |
---|---|---|---|
Kant | Husserl Vs Kant | I 120 Ethics/Kant: ethics can only be realized in autonomy, that is in distance to all the needs and inclinations. HusserlVsKant: for Kant, missing and valuating acts are not already foreign regulations. HusserlVsCategorical Imperative: the empty way of generalization is not sufficient to characterize ethical correctness. Ethics/Husserl: feeling or value predicates have their own legalism. |
E. Husserl I Peter Prechtl, Husserl zur Einführung, Hamburg 1991 II "Husserl" in: Eva Picardi et al., Interpretationen - Hauptwerke der Philosophie: 20. Jahrhundert, Stuttgart 1992 |
![]() |