Find counter arguments by entering NameVs… or …VsName.
The author or concept searched is found in the following 2 entries.
| Disputed term/author/ism | Author |
Entry |
Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Language Acquisition | Neogrammarians | Lyons I 29 Language acquisition/Analogy/Linguistics/Neogrammarians/Lyons: For example, a child says "flyed" instead of flew: important factor of language development, not only mistake. >Analogies, >Grammar, >Learning, >Mistakes. |
Ly II John Lyons Semantics Cambridge, MA 1977 Lyons I John Lyons Introduction to Theoretical Lingustics, Cambridge/MA 1968 German Edition: Einführung in die moderne Linguistik München 1995 |
| Laws | Neogrammarians | Lyons I 29 Neogrammarians/Laws/Lyons: spoke of fixed laws, e. g. for the change of sounds, for example "Verner's Law". I 29 Borrowing: from dialect or neighbouring language: should explain exceptions in the phonetic laws. >Phonemes, >Language development. |
Ly II John Lyons Semantics Cambridge, MA 1977 Lyons I John Lyons Introduction to Theoretical Lingustics, Cambridge/MA 1968 German Edition: Einführung in die moderne Linguistik München 1995 |
| |||
| Disputed term/author/ism | Author Vs Author |
Entry |
Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neogrammarians | Saussure Vs Neogrammarians | I 17 SaussureVsNeogrammarians: better question: how to build a single language as a whole. I 27 VsNeogrammarians: their sound laws have no real explanatory value in themselves. Neogrammarians: Thesis: Nature sounds are in themselves predisposed for meaning entries. |
F. de Saussure I Peter Prechtl Saussure zur Einführung Hamburg 1994 (Junius) |
| |||