Dictionary of Arguments


Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]

Screenshot Tabelle Begriffes

 

Find counter arguments by entering NameVs… or …VsName.

Enhanced Search:
Search term 1: Author or Term Search term 2: Author or Term


together with


The author or concept searched is found in the following 2 entries.
Disputed term/author/ism Author
Entry
Reference
Relations Hume I 121/122
Relation/KantVsHume: relations are not external to ideas. HumeVsKant: each relation is external in their terms, e.g. equality is not a property of the figures themselves, e.g. neighboring and distant figures do not explain what neighborhood and distance is. Relation anticipates a synthesis. Space/time: space and time are in the mind only a composition, bearing relation through fiction. E.g. association: creates relation, but does not explain that distance is a relation.
Cf. >Properties/Chisholm.
>Association/Hume, >Mind/Hume.
I 135
Relations/Hume: relations cannot be derived from experience, they are effects of association principles external to the things (atomism). KantVsHume: not externally. Kant: therefore, critical philosophy instead of empiricism.
>KantVsHume.
I 139
KantVsHume: relations are so far dependent on the nature of things, as things presuppose a synthesis as phenomena that result from the same source as the synthesis of relations. Therefore, the critical philosophy is not empiricism. There is an a priori, that means, the imagination is productive. >Imagination/Hume, >Imagination/Kant.
I 145
Causality/Hume: causality is the only relation, from which something can be concluded.
D. Hume
I Gilles Delueze David Hume, Frankfurt 1997 (Frankreich 1953,1988)
II Norbert Hoerster Hume: Existenz und Eigenschaften Gottes aus Speck(Hg) Grundprobleme der großen Philosophen der Neuzeit I Göttingen, 1997
Relations Waismann Friedrich Waismann Suchen und Finden in der Mathematik 1938 in Kursbuch 8 Mathematik 1967

92
Relations/Waismann: How are relations possible? If the relationship aRb is present, the situation consists of three parts.
To the two terms of the relation and the relation itself. But the terms a and b must themselves again be linked with the relation R, otherwise the fact would fall into three separate terms.
>Complex.
It thus appears that there is a need for further relations which connect a and b to R, a type of mortar. Infinite regress.
>Relation/Kant.
Waismann: such a question appears to be the essence or the structure of reality, whereas it is evoked only by the mist around our concepts. This is also caused by our own language.
>Concepts, >Meaning, >Sense.

Waismann I
F. Waismann
Einführung in das mathematische Denken Darmstadt 1996

Waismann II
F. Waismann
Logik, Sprache, Philosophie Stuttgart 1976



No results. Please choose an author or concept or try a different keyword-search.