Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
VI 46/47
Cognitive condition/Wright/RortyVsWright: for him, a speaker should function like a well-oiled machine. - This is traditional epistemology according to which prejudice and superstition are just sand in the works.
>Epistemology, >Knowledge, >World/thinking, >Thinking.
According to Wright we would have to recognize the right functions a priori. - Through knowledge of the content.
PragmatismVsCognitivity: nothing more than contingent consensus. - For them, content is not important.
>Content, cf. >Cognitive psychology, >Pragmatism.
VI 51
Cognitition/cognitivity/cognitive/fact/Wright/Rorty: Wright’s cognitive commandment: Advantage: We do not need reified facts. - Instead: Reference on range of possible causes.
((s) Cognition makes facts superfluous.)
Vs: Problem: that presupposes a concept of the mode of operation of a representation machine.
VI 429f
Cognitition/language/Rorty: cognition is not possible without language. - Therefore there is a gap between sensation and cognition.
Certainly there is a causal continuity between experience and thought - but it also exists between nutrition and thinking.
>World/thinking, >Representation.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.