Dictionary of Arguments


Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]

Screenshot Tabelle Begriffes

 

Find counter arguments by entering NameVs… or …VsName.

Enhanced Search:
Search term 1: Author or Term Search term 2: Author or Term


together with


The author or concept searched is found in the following controversies.
Disputed term/author/ism Author Vs Author
Entry
Reference
Dummett, M. Peacocke Vs Dummett, M. EMD II 165
Assertion/Dummett: in the strict sense, it can then be characterized as a quasi-assertion whose justification criterion coincides with the truth conditions for the corresponding thought. PeacockeVsDummett: that brings him into the circle! We must remember that it is an adequacy condition that each approach provides the connection between truth and assertion (better: statement): a statement is true if things are as he says in the statement. How to proceed then?
Parallel to the game:
Def winning/Peacocke: if you meet the goals that you have qua player.
So we have to show that in the language of a community one game is played instead of another. And in the analysis we must not use any such terms as "winning" or "goals qua player".

Peacocke I
Chr. R. Peacocke
Sense and Content Oxford 1983

Peacocke II
Christopher Peacocke
"Truth Definitions and Actual Languges"
In
Truth and Meaning, G. Evans/J. McDowell Oxford 1976

EMD II
G. Evans/J. McDowell
Truth and Meaning Oxford 1977

Evans I
Gareth Evans
"The Causal Theory of Names", in: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. Vol. 47 (1973) 187-208
In
Eigennamen, Ursula Wolf Frankfurt/M. 1993

Evans II
Gareth Evans
"Semantic Structure and Logical Form"
In
Truth and Meaning, G. Evans/J. McDowell Oxford 1976

Evans III
G. Evans
The Varieties of Reference (Clarendon Paperbacks) Oxford 1989

The author or concept searched is found in the following theses of the more related field of specialization.
Disputed term/author/ism Author
Entry
Reference
Truth Criterion Dummett, M. III 17/18
Criterion of truth / truth criterion / Dummett: the thesis that there can be no tr. c. is now commonplace.   Reason: we determine the sentence sense on the truth conditions so that we do not first know the meaning of the sentence and then be able to apply a criterion.
  Just as we do not a criterion for winning the game because that is also taught in learning the game.