Find counter arguments by entering NameVs… or …VsName.
The author or concept searched is found in the following 1 entries.
| Disputed term/author/ism | Author |
Entry |
Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inheritance | Darwin | Gould III 170 Inheritance/Darwin/Gould: Darwin did not know the mechanism of inheritance! The inheritance mechanism was first discovered by Mendel. >Evolution, >Species. |
Gould I Stephen Jay Gould The Panda’s Thumb. More Reflections in Natural History, New York 1980 German Edition: Der Daumen des Panda Frankfurt 2009 Gould II Stephen Jay Gould Hen’s Teeth and Horse’s Toes. Further Reflections in Natural History, New York 1983 German Edition: Wie das Zebra zu seinen Streifen kommt Frankfurt 1991 Gould III Stephen Jay Gould Full House. The Spread of Excellence from Plato to Darwin, New York 1996 German Edition: Illusion Fortschritt Frankfurt 2004 Gould IV Stephen Jay Gould The Flamingo’s Smile. Reflections in Natural History, New York 1985 German Edition: Das Lächeln des Flamingos Basel 1989 |
| |||
| Disputed term/author/ism | Author Vs Author |
Entry |
Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lamarck, J.-B. | Dennett Vs Lamarck, J.-B. | I 445 VsLamarck: for a Lamarckian inheritance to arise at all, a Darwinian process is a prerequisite. Darwin himself concluded Lamarck s inheritance in his concept one! (As gain). I 449 Learning / Lamarckism / Dennett: their children will have to learn the vibrato as they. Baldwin-Effekt/Lamarckism: the Baldwin effect (learning by reinforcement, acceleration) is saved by the fact that living beings inherit their respective ability to acquire certain properties, and not the properties that they really acquire. |
Dennett I D. Dennett Darwin’s Dangerous Idea, New York 1995 German Edition: Darwins gefährliches Erbe Hamburg 1997 Dennett II D. Dennett Kinds of Minds, New York 1996 German Edition: Spielarten des Geistes Gütersloh 1999 Dennett III Daniel Dennett "COG: Steps towards consciousness in robots" In Bewusstein, Thomas Metzinger Paderborn/München/Wien/Zürich 1996 Dennett IV Daniel Dennett "Animal Consciousness. What Matters and Why?", in: D. C. Dennett, Brainchildren. Essays on Designing Minds, Cambridge/MA 1998, pp. 337-350 In Der Geist der Tiere, D Perler/M. Wild Frankfurt/M. 2005 |
| Lamarck, J.-B. | Gould Vs Lamarck, J.-B. | I 86 GouldVsLamarck: Lamarckism is not true just in the field, which he always kept occupied as his special domain, as a biological theory of heredity. Nevertheless, it can (if only by analogy) apply to the "inheritance" in a very different kind of "evolution" - in the human culture. |
Gould I Stephen Jay Gould The Panda’s Thumb. More Reflections in Natural History, New York 1980 German Edition: Der Daumen des Panda Frankfurt 2009 Gould II Stephen Jay Gould Hen’s Teeth and Horse’s Toes. Further Reflections in Natural History, New York 1983 German Edition: Wie das Zebra zu seinen Streifen kommt Frankfurt 1991 Gould III Stephen Jay Gould Full House. The Spread of Excellence from Plato to Darwin, New York 1996 German Edition: Illusion Fortschritt Frankfurt 2004 Gould IV Stephen Jay Gould The Flamingo’s Smile. Reflections in Natural History, New York 1985 German Edition: Das Lächeln des Flamingos Basel 1989 |
| Relativism | Pinker Vs Relativism | I 528/529 PinkerVsMead, Margret: Mead called the Arapesh meek. They were headhunters. She claimed the Tschambuli had changed gender roles, because the men had curls. In reality, they beat their wives, murdered neighboring tribes, and considered murder a milestone in the life of a young man, which authorized him to wear the face paint that had seemed so effeminate to Margaret Mead. >Cultural relativism. Anthropology/Cultural Relativism/Pinker: contrary to popular opinion, there are many constants in all human cultures: E.g. prestige, status, power and wealth disparities, property, inheritances, regulation of sexuality, jealousy, favoritism of young women as sex partners, division of labor by gender, hostility towards foreign groups, violence, rape, murder. I 530 Since every human owes their existence to ancestors who were winners somewhere in some way, everyone is now meant to fight in certain situations. |
Pi I St. Pinker How the Mind Works, New York 1997 German Edition: Wie das Denken im Kopf entsteht München 1998 |
| Various Authors | Locke Vs Various Authors | Danto I 112 LockeVsInnate Ideas: God created us so that we can acquire the basic ideas with our senses, therefore it would be superfluous to provide us with innate ideas. Locke I 78 Second Treatise Law/LockeVsFilmer: Adam did not obtain an absolute right of dominion over his children or the world either by paternity law or by God's positive gift. Had he possessed this, his heirs would not have possesed this. If these had attained it, there would be neither a determination of the natural nor the positive right from which it could be seen who was entitled to the right of inheritance. I 79 Legitimacy/Locke: claims to derive political violence from the "true origin": the state of nature without power. Locke I 159 Law of Nature/LockeVsGrotius: unthinkable without God's existence (Grotius: but thinkable, even if the assumption would be a great crime!). Locke II 195/196 Language/LockeVsArtificial Language: (fashion of the time, according to Leibniz, according to the algebra model): instead, analysis of the use of language, critical discussion of its function. An individual cannot reform his or her mother tongue. |
Loc III J. Locke An Essay Concerning Human Understanding Danto I A. C. Danto Connections to the World - The Basic Concepts of Philosophy, New York 1989 German Edition: Wege zur Welt München 1999 Danto III Arthur C. Danto Nietzsche as Philosopher: An Original Study, New York 1965 German Edition: Nietzsche als Philosoph München 1998 Danto VII A. C. Danto The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art (Columbia Classics in Philosophy) New York 2005 |
| |||