Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Geach, Peter T.
 
Books on Amazon
Copula I 221
Copula/Geach: if you understand concept and object correctly, you do not need copula. - Instead, you can use "falls under". - (In ancient times it was also handled like this) - ((s) "is a" suggests false identity (at most partial identity, i.e. classification) - Frege late: VsFrege early: nor "falls under" - "is a"/Frege: does not mean "belongs to a class"!
I 221
"Is a..."/Geach: is no logical relation between an x and an object (class) called "human."

Gea I
P.T. Geach
Logic Matters Oxford 1972


> Counter arguments against Geach



back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-30