Economics Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Subsententials: Subsentential is an expression for linguistic items below the sentence level, i.e. words, parts of words, and combinations of words that do not form sentences. It is crucial that subsential utterances cannot be true or false since they do not form statements or judgments. See also statements, utterances, sentences, partial sentences, truth values, judgments._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Robert Brandom on Subsententials - Dictionary of Arguments
I 650 Subsentential Expressions/Brandom: can be regarded as conceptually divided, despite the fact that they can not occur as premises and conclusions - even unrepeatable tokenings can be considered as divided because they can stand in anaphoric chains. >Anaphora, >Words, >Sentences, >Sentence meanig, >Meaning, >Frege principle, >Compositionality. --- II 21/22 Terms are divided inferentially - they play roles in reasoning contexts._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Bra I R. Brandom Making it exlicit. Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment, Cambridge/MA 1994 German Edition: Expressive Vernunft Frankfurt 2000 Bra II R. Brandom Articulating reasons. An Introduction to Inferentialism, Cambridge/MA 2001 German Edition: Begründen und Begreifen Frankfurt 2001 |
||
> Counter arguments against Brandom
> Counter arguments in relation to Subsententials
