## Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome | |||

| |||

Terminologies: here, special features of the language use of the individual authors are explained._____________ Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||

Author | Item | Summary | Meta data |
---|---|---|---|

I 14 Product/mereology/Simons: ~ Average = greatest lower bound. - Total: "The individual that overlaps something if it at least overlaps one of x or y - not always = least upper bound (lub) - lattice theory: "smallest individual; which contains both". Definition difference: the largest individual that is in x contained, which has no part in common with y - exists only if x is not part of y - Definition fusion/general sum: is the sum of all objects which satisfies a specific predicate Fx, denoted by the variable-binding operator s: sx [Fx] - There may be several fusions - the sum is the largest fusion. --- I 226 Fusion: includes replacement of the former. E.g. a former F is replaced by two Fs - Definition nucleus/general product: product of the objects that meet a predicate px[Fx] - Universe: sum of all objects. - This corresponds to the unit element of the Boolean algebra. - Atom: an individual that does not have any parts. - Individual general: may have parts. - Universe with 3 atoms (atom) may have 7 individuals. - If there are c atoms, there are 2c- 1 combinations. - It follows that there cannot be even numbers. - Combinations of individuals are individuals themselves again. --- I 32 Definition upper bound/mereology/Simons: the individuals which fulfill a predicate fx are bound up if there is an individual from which they are all a part. - Sum: "the individual that overlaps something if it at least overlaps one of x or y". - ((S) Hasse diagram: the upper point is part of the bottom.) - Universe: upper bound for everything. - The existence of an upper bound does not imply the existence of sums or least upper bounds. - E.g. the set of subsets of natural numbers which are either non-empty or finite or infinite and have a finite complement-. Each collection is upwardly limited by the entire set of natural numbers without a least upper bound. E.g.: collection of all finite sets of even numbers. - E.g. open intervals on the real number strand: here each two open intervals have at least an upper bound, namely the interval whose endpoints. --- I 33 Their outer extreme points are, however, separate intervals with a gap between them and they do not have a sum - if a sum exists, then also a least upper bound but not vice versa. - Being part of a wider whole means: having an upper bound. --- I 60 Definition prosthetics/Lesniewski/Simons: ("first principles"), Lesniewskis counterpart to propositional calculus, which it contains as a fragment. In addition, it includes variables for each type of statements and quantifiers - equivalent with systems of proposition types (statements types) by Church or Henkin. --- I 112 Definition upperbound/mereology/Simons: the individuals who are fulfilling a predicate fx are bound up if there is an individual from which they are all a part. - Sum: "the individual that overlaps something if it overlaps at least one of x or y". --- I 211 Coincidence/Simons: equality of the elements is not sufficient for equality of the parts. - (s) E.g. member-like bodies may have different chairpersons) - coincidence: = temporarily indistinguishable. - The class {Tib + Tail]} has only three parts. - Tibbles can have a lot more. --- I 225 Permanent coincidence of F1 and F2: indistinguishable in the real world. - At most by modal property. --- I 228 Coincidence principle/Simons: coincidence (all parts have in common) is necessary for superposition (two things at the same time in the same place). --- I 228 Composition/Composition/mereology/Simons: E.g. the ship, but not the wood is composed of planks. - A human has parts that are not shared by the collection of atoms. --- I 334 Topology/mereology/Simons topological concepts that go beyond the mereology: adjacency and connectivity - are used for the definition of "whole". _____________ Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. The note [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Simons I P. Simons Parts. A Study in Ontology Oxford New York 1987 |

> Counter arguments against **Simons**

Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2020-04-10