Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Religious beliefs: in contrast to other beliefs, religious beliefs are usually not subject of a questioning. Thus, for example, this is not about the probability of their application or the possibility of their refutation. Even if there are religious arguments, belief itself is not argumentative. See also beliefs._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Sophists on Religious Belief - Dictionary of Arguments
Taureck I 38 Religion/Antiquity/Sophists/Taureck: the gods of Greece had no priests, and an individual could at the same time worship several gods. The Sophists took a step towards more freedom from the already tolerant religion. >Religious belief/Ancient philosophy >Religious belief/Epicurus >Religious belief/Sophists >Religious belief >God/Aristotle >God/Plato >God. _____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Sophists Taureck I B. H.F. Taureck Die Sophisten Hamburg 1995 |
||
> Counter arguments against Sophists
> Counter arguments in relation to Religious Belief
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-27